Being healthy has
always been trendy. Diets and exercise regimens have been popular for decades.
With the prevalent use of social media, a person can find an online community
from which they can find inspiration for their personal lifestyle goals. The culture
of dieting is pervasive, common, and perhaps most importantly, dangerously
acceptable. Think about the last time you heard someone say they wanted to lose
“x” amount of pounds, or the last time someone mentioned they were trying a new
pattern of eating for their health. It has become quite common in every day
conversation, from “today is my cheat day” to “no thanks, I’m on a diet.”
Intentionally choosing to eat vegetables over hot dogs every day is not
inherently bad. In fact, we should encourage patients to make conscious efforts
in eating delicious, nutritious foods. But what happens when we take it too
far?
In the past few years, orthorexia
nervosa, a pathologically disordered healthy eating disorder, has gained quite
the spotlight in media coverage. It is not recognized by the Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association (DSM-5), and not
very well documented or understood. Orthorexia nervosa is not body dysmorphia
nor is it necessarily always driven by pure desire for thinness. It is an
eating disorder that evolves from only eating what the individual perceives is
to promote good health, whether that be mainstream acceptable healthy foods, or
dangerously restrictive diets. Dr. Steven Bratman, a physician who practices alternative
medicine, first described orthorexia nervosa in an article in the 1997 Yoga
Journal. It would not be until 2004 when orthorexia was described in the
peer-reviewed journal of Eating and Weight Disorders—Studies on Anorexia,
Bulimia and Obesity. Since then, there have been multiple propositions for
diagnostic criteria, although none that is formally or officially used.
Chelsea Salas DUCOM 2020